MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968300199 · doi:10.1080/09670260600914097

Combining small and large subunit ribosomal DNA genes to resolve relationships among orders of the Rhodymeniophycidae (Rhodophyta): recognition of the Acrosymphytales ord. nov. and Sebdeniales ord. nov.

2006· article· en· W1968300199 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Phycology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal plant biology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsNew Brunswick Innovation Foundation
KeywordsBiologyGigartinalesSensuRibosomal DNAEvolutionary biologyPhylogenetic treeRibosomal RNATaxonDNA barcodingPhylogenetic nomenclaturePhylogeneticsCladeGeneticsZoologyGeneEcologyGenusAlgae

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Published phylogenies based on nuclear small-subunit (SSU) ribosomal DNA have largely failed to resolve ordinal relationships within the Rhodymeniophycidae. Of the nine orders currently recognized, SSU analyses only consistently resolved an association between the Halymeniales and Rhodymeniales. This situation was confounded by an unexpected association between the Rhodymeniales and Gracilariales shown in published combined SSU + LSU (large subunit ribosomal DNA) phylogenies. To investigate this conundrum further, nuclear SSU and LSU sequences were determined to produce a comprehensive combined data set of 61 ingroup taxa, representing 22 families within the Rhodymeniophycidae, emphasizing disparate lineages of the Gigartinales sensu lato. Molecular phylogenies were constructed from individual gene and combined data sets in an effort to achieve increased ordinal resolution. The new analyses realized little increased resolution among the orders, but they did resolve the conflicting taxonomic affinities of the Rhodymeniales indicating that they ally with the Halymeniales and not the Gracilariales. The latter order was affiliated to the Nemastomatales in all SSU-only analyses, as well as for SSU + LSU combined Bayesian results with the covarion option invoked. In addition, the resulting phylogenetic hypotheses have shed light on the taxonomic associations of a few rogue families of the Gigartinales sensu lato. Notably, the Acrosymphytaceae failed to join other families of the Gigartinales and we therefore propose the Acrosymphytales ord. nov. to accommodate this family. The Sebdeniaceae was generally weakly allied as sister to the Rhodymeniales rather than with the Halymeniales where it is currently placed. Owing to its consistently equivocal placement in contemporary molecular analyses, as well as a suite of anatomical characters intermediate between the Halymeniales sensu stricto and Rhodymeniales, we here propose the Sebdeniales ord. nov.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.656

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it