Effects of the Natural Tidal Cycle and Artificial Temperature Cycling on Hsp Levels in the Tidepool Sculpin<i>Oligocottus maculosus</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The rocky intertidal zone is characterized by a predictable cycle of environmental change cued by the ebb and flow of the tides. Tidepools are thus an excellent environment in which to determine whether predictability of environmental change can entrain an endogenous rhythmicity in heat shock protein (Hsp) levels. In this study, we monitored changes in Hsp mRNA and protein levels that occurred over the tidal cycle in tidepool sculpins and investigated whether there was an endogenous tidal rhythm in Hsp expression that persisted once the sculpins were transferred to a stable environment. Fluctuations in the tidepool environment increased hsc70, hsp70, and hsp90 mRNA levels, which translated into increased Hsc/Hsp70 and Hsp90 protein levels; however, this was not due to an endogenous tidal rhythm in Hsp levels because sculpins held under constant conditions did not show any rhythmicity in the expression of these genes. By exposing sculpins to an artificial temperature cycling regime that mimicked the temperature changes of a mid-intertidal pool, we were able to account for the direct role of temperature in regulating Hsp expression. However, there are additional extrinsic factors that likely integrate with temperature and result in differences between the hsp induction profiles that were observed in sculpins inhabiting their natural environment and those in cycling conditions in the laboratory.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".