MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968349615 · doi:10.1080/00268976.2010.483238

Anharmonic analysis of the PFI-ZEKE photoelectron spectrum of CH <sub>2</sub> F <sub>2</sub> from the ionization potential to the onset of fragmentation

2010· article· en· W1968349615 on OpenAlexafffund
David Luckhaus, Piotr W. Forysinski, Philipp Zielke, Ruth Signorell

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Physics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftWestern Canada Research GridCompute Canada
KeywordsDifluoromethaneAnharmonicityAb initioAtomic physicsChemistryIonizationAdiabatic processIonization energyDissociation (chemistry)Potential energyAb initio quantum chemistry methodsFragmentation (computing)Molecular physicsPhysicsIonMoleculeQuantum mechanicsPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The complete vibrational fine structure of the pulsed-field-ionization zero-kinetic-energy photoelectron spectrum of difluoromethane is analysed in terms of fully coupled anharmonic calculations. Nine-dimensional ab initio potential functions complete up to five-body terms are constructed directly from ab initio calculations using Møller–Plesset and coupled cluster theory together with up to quadruple-ζ basis sets. The onset of dissociation is accompanied by strongly anharmonic vibrational dynamics involving resonant interactions between both symmetric and non-symmetric modes. The detailed analysis leads to a partial revision of earlier interpretations and provides improved theoretical values for the adiabatic ionization potential IP=12.740 eV and for the lowest dissociation limit both within about 1 kJ mol–1 of experimental estimates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.074
Threshold uncertainty score0.687

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular PhysicsSame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207