MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968403234 · doi:10.2307/2672065

Strategies For Sustainable Development: Experiences from the Pacific

2000· article· en· W1968403234 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Penelope Schoeffel

Bibliographic record

VenuePacific Affairs · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIsland Studies and Pacific Affairs
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSustainable developmentGeographyPolitical scienceEnvironmental planningLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

* Contents * 1. Sustainable Development and the Pacific Islands - John Overton * PART I: CONTEXTUAL ISSUES * 2. Resources and the Environment - John Overton and R R Thaman * 3. An Historical and Political Context - Richard Wartho * 4. Culture and Society - Regina Scheyvens * 5. Livelihoods - Nicholas Purdie * 6. Land Tenure and Atoll Society in Kiribati - Peter King * 7. Migration and the Cook Islands - Kirsti Hooker and Judith Varcoe * 8. Vanua: Land, People and Culture in Fiji - Kalaveti Batibasaqa * PART II: EFFECTS OF DEVELOPMENT * 9. Logging in Melanesia - Regina Scheyvens and Ross Cassells * 10. Mining in Papua New Guinea - Regina Scheyvens and Leonard Lagisa * 11. Marine Resources - Salome XXX * 12. Population and Urban Environments - Donovan Storey * 13. Commodity Production and Unsustainable Agriculture - John Overton, Warwick Murray and Imam Ali * PART III SUSTAINABLE ALTERNATIVES * 14. Nature Conservation (and Aid in Western Samoa) - Ned Hardie-Boyes * 15. Sustainable Agricultural Options - John Overton * 16. Sustainable Forestry Options - Regina Scheyvens and Ross Cassells * 17. Ecotourism - Regina Scheyvens * 18. Sustainable Urban Footprints - John Overton and Donovan Storey * PART IV CONCLUSIONS AND ISSUES * 19. Conclusions - John Overton and Regina Scheyvens

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.153

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0090.005
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations53
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePacific AffairsSame topicIsland Studies and Pacific AffairsFrench-language works237,207