MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968428723 · doi:10.1159/000085982

A New Model for Determining the Influence of Age and Sex on Functional Recovery following Hypoxic-Ischemic Brain Damage

2005· article· en· W1968428723 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDevelopmental Neuroscience · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal and fetal brain pathology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThalamusIschemiaHypoxia (environmental)HippocampusBrain damageMedicineCortex (anatomy)Stroke (engine)Cerebral cortexInternal medicineAnesthesiaNeurosciencePhysiologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stroke is a disorder affecting the lives of all age groups, and particularly those at the opposite ends of the age spectrum. It is generally believed that the immature brain is more resistant to damage resulting from a hypoxic/ischemic injury, and that it is also more 'plastic' in terms of its ability to recover. Evidence from our laboratory, and a host of others, has indicated, however, that the developing brain may in fact be more sensitive to injury resulting from hypoxia-ischemia. The question remains, however, whether the immature brain has a greater capacity for recovery. In order to determine the relative capability for functional recovery between age groups, a stroke model of comparable injury is required. This paper describes a new rodent model of ischemic injury allowing for comparisons of behavioral recovery spanning the spectrum of ages between newborn and the elderly. Endothelin-1, a potent vasoconstrictor, was stereotactically injected into the brains of 10-, 63-, and 180-day-old Wistar rats, immediately adjacent to the middle cerebral artery. Regionally, the cortex, caudate, and thalamus were most significantly affected, with sparing of the hippocampus. Pathologic assessment indicated a similar degree of injury across age groups affecting the territorial distribution of the middle cerebral artery, with a predominance of damage in the anterior sections of the cortex and caudate (p < 0.05), compared to the posterior sections including the cortex and thalamus. There were no regional differences in the extent of damage between age groups. Interestingly, however, there were significant differences between males and females regarding the overall extent of brain damage (p < 0.05), with males showing greater damage than females. In addition, there were significant regional differences in the extent of damage between males and females, particularly regarding cortical damage (p < 0.05), both anteriorly and posteriorly, and the caudate anteriorly (p < 0.05). Our findings provide an important new model for comparison of brain damage among the entire spectrum of ages affected by stroke. Importantly, this will allow for further investigations regarding both functional recovery and gender difference comparisons. This may have important ramifications for the development of therapeutic interventions that are age and gender specific.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.874
Threshold uncertainty score0.333

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it