DNA Sequence Recognition of Thiazole-Containing Cross-Linked Polyamides Can Be Favored by T-A Steps
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The binding ability of cross-linked thiazolated polyamides (containing the base sequence-reading elements thiazole(Th)-pyrrole(Py)-pyr-role(Py) and thiazole(Th)-imidazole(Im)-pyrrol(Py) to various DNA dodecamers has been investigated. CD titration experiments at high salt concentration demonstrate that the dimers with a heptanediyl linker (C7 dimer) show a significantly higher sequence specificity than their corresponding monomers. The dimer of Th-Py-Py primarily prefers binding to pure AT sequences and that of Th-Im-Py to the dodecamer sequences containing a GC pair within the central sequence (e.g. AACGTT). Surprisingly, the sequence binding ability is strongly influenced by the presence of a T-A step: e.g. Th-Py-Py has a similar affinity to the sequences TTTAAA and ATCGTA; likewise Th-Im-Py shows a preference for these sequences. The CD results correlate with footprinting data. Related biochemical studies on the effect of polyamides on DNA gyrase activity in vitro show that the C7 dimers most effectively inhibit the enzyme activity compared with the monomers and the natural reference minor groove binder distamycin. The highest inhibitory potency is observed for the Th-Py-Py-dimer. The role of the T-A step in binding of the cross-linked dimer to the minor groove is discussed in light of the sequence recognition of the TATA box binding protein.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".