MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Extracellular Volume Changes and Blood Pressure Levels in Hemodialysis Patients

2003· article· en· W1968466300 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Krassimir Katzarski, José C. Divino Filho, Jonas Bergström

Bibliographic record

VenueHemodialysis International · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDialysis and Renal Disease Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBlood pressureHemodialysisExtracellular fluidAmbulatory blood pressureDiastoleLeft ventricular hypertrophyAmbulatoryIntravascular volume statusInternal medicineCardiologyVolume overloadUrologyExtracellularHeart failureChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Despite the use of highly efficient antihypertensive drugs (AHD), blood pressure (BP) is poorly controlled in the vast majority of hemodialysis (HD) patients. Many of them show no reduction in nocturnal BP, a finding that is associated with left ventricular hypertrophy. The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of the removal of a fluid overload on BP by monitoring the ambulatory BP during 48 hours in 16 hypertensive HD patients treated with AHD. Our aim was to obtain a gradual reduction in post-HD body weight (BW) over a period of 3 to 4 months. METHODS: During a period of 3-4 months, the postdialysis BW was reduced as the minimal tolerable BW was gradually achieved by slightly increasing the ultrafiltration volume. The Na concentration in the dialysate was reduced from 143-141 mmol/L to 139-138 mmol/L. Extracellular volume (ECV) was measured with a multiple-frequency bioimpedance analyzer (Xitron 4000B, Xitron Technologies Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Based on the change in ECV, the patients were subdivided into two groups: group 1 with a reduction in ECV (n = 10), and group 2 with no reduction (n = 6). At the start of the study, BW, BP, and AHD in group 1 and group 2 were virtually identical. RESULTS: Group 1 showed a significant reduction during the entire 48-hour period in systolic (156 +/- 16 mmHg vs. 140 +/- 14 mmHg, P = 0.030) and diastolic BP (97 +/- 12 mmHg vs. 87 +/- 9 mmHg, P = 0.026) as well as in mean arterial pressure (MAP, 117 +/- 13 vs. 105 +/- 10 mmHg, P = 0.027). This reduction was more marked during the night (systolic BP 156 +/- 15 mmHg vs. 138 +/- 14 mmHg, P = 0.007; diastolic BP 97 +/- 12 mmHg vs. 85 +/- 9 mmHg, P = 0.009) than during the day (157 +/- 18 mmHg vs. 142 +/- 15 mmHg, P = 0.067; diastolic BP 97 +/- 13 mmHg vs. 90 +/- 9 mmHg, P = 0.126). A significant reduction in systolic load also occurred during the entire 48-hour period (76 +/- 24% vs. 46 +/- 28%, P = 0.043) as well as in night systolic load (75 +/- 21% vs. 41 +/- 30%, P = 0.015) and night diastolic load (67 +/- 32% vs. 39 +/- 31%, P = 0.030). AHD were stopped in eight and reduced in two patients. There were no significant reductions in BP and AHD in group 2. CONCLUSIONS: The removal of excess fluid is necessary for adequate BP control and especially for the reduction in elevated BP during the night.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHemodialysis InternationalSame topicDialysis and Renal Disease ManagementFrench-language works237,207