MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968471163 · doi:10.1074/jbc.m309414200

Quantitative Evaluation of the Contribution of Weak Lysine-binding Sites Present within Apolipoprotein(a) Kringle IV Types 6–8 to Lipoprotein(a) Assembly

2004· article· en· W1968471163 on OpenAlexafffund
Lev Becker, P. Michael Cook, Theodore G. Wright, Marlys L. Koschinsky

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicClick Chemistry and Applications
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersQueen's University
KeywordsLysineApolipoprotein BLipoprotein(a)LipoproteinChemistryBiochemistryAmino acidCholesterol

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) assembly, non-covalent interactions between apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) and low density lipoprotein precede specific disulfide bond formation. Studies have shown that the non-covalent step involves an interaction between the weak lysine-binding sites (WLBS) present within each of apo(a) kringle IV types 6, 7, and 8 (KIV(6-8)), and two lysine residues (Lys(680) and Lys(690)) within the NH(2) terminus of the apolipoprotein B-100 (apoB) component of low density lipoprotein. In the present study, we introduced single point mutations (E56G) into each of the WLBS present in apo(a) KIV(6-8) and expressed these mutations in the context of a 17-kringle (17K) recombinant apo(a) variant. Single mutations that disrupt the WLBS in KIV(6), KIV(7), and KIV(8), as well as mutants that disrupt the WLBS in both KIV(6) and KIV(7), or both KIV(7) and KIV(8), were assessed for their ability to form non-covalent and covalent Lp(a) complexes. Our results demonstrate that both apo(a) KIV(7) and KIV(8), but not KIV(6), are required for maximally efficient non-covalent and covalent Lp(a) assembly. Single mutations in the WLBS of KIV(7) or KIV(8) resulted in a 3-fold decrease in the affinity of 17K recombinant apo(a) for apoB, and a 20% reduction in the rate of covalent Lp(a) formation. Tandem mutations in the WLBS in both KIV(7) and KIV(8) resulted in a 13-fold reduction in the binding affinity between apo(a) and apoB, and a 75% reduction in the rate of the covalent step of Lp(a) formation. We also showed that KIV(7) and KIV(8) specifically bind with high affinity to apoB-derived peptides containing Lys(690) or Lys(680), respectively. Taken together, our data demonstrate that specific interactions between apo(a) KIV(7) and KIV(8) and Lys(680) and Lys(690) in apoB mediate a high affinity non-covalent interaction between apo(a) and low density lipoprotein, which dictates the efficiency of covalent Lp(a) formation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological ChemistrySame topicClick Chemistry and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207