MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968485800 · doi:10.1103/physreve.80.021920

Dynamic photophysical processes in laser-irradiated human cortical skull bone measured by means of modulated diffuse luminescence

2009· article· en· W1968485800 on OpenAlexaff
Andreas Mandelis, Chi-Hang Kwan, Anna Matvienko

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review E · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntersystem crossingChromophoreLuminescenceExcited stateRelaxation (psychology)Attenuation coefficientExcitationMolecular physicsMaterials scienceAtomic physicsChemistryOpticsPhysicsPhotochemistryQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The technique of modulated luminescence of bones was developed experimentally and theoretically and was subsequently used to interpret measurements performed on the cortical layer of human skull bones. The photophysical theory is based on the optical excitation and decay rate equations of the fluorescent endogenous chromophore and on the molecular interaction parameter with the photon field density in the matrix of the bone. An effective mean relaxation lifetime, ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{M}$, of skull cortical bone was derived theoretically and was found to depend on the endogenous chromophore decay lifetime, ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{2}$, in the upper energy state, on the generated luminescence field density through its dependence on the incident photon field density and on the thickness of the bone. A linear dependence of ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{M}$ on laser beam intensity, ${I}_{0}$, was found and sensitivity of the value of ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{M}$ to bone thickness, $L$, was observed for $L\ensuremath{\le}6.2\text{ }\text{mm}$. Both experimental dependencies of ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{M}$ on ${I}_{0}$ and $L$ were in excellent agreement with the theoretical model. The unusually long relaxation luminescence lifetime was accounted for theoretically by means of an excited-state manifold invoking intersystem crossing to a forbidden state followed by decay to the ground state of the chromophore. Best fits to the data were able to yield measurements of the following chromophore and photon field parameters: ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{2}=19.7\text{ }\text{ms}$, optical scattering coefficient ${\ensuremath{\mu}}_{s}(659\text{ }\text{nm})=44\text{ }340\text{ }{\text{m}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$, optical absorption coefficient ${\ensuremath{\mu}}_{a}(659\text{ }\text{nm})=13\text{ }{\text{m}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$, and coupling coefficient ${B}_{21}=1.6\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{4}\text{ }{\text{m}}^{3}\text{ }{\text{J}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}\text{ }{\text{s}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$, the decay coupling coefficient of the endogenous chromophore participating in the optical interaction in the form of stimulated luminescence emission mediated by the luminescence photon field between the long-lived excited state ${E}_{2}$ and the lower (ground) state ${E}_{1}$. The method of modulated luminescence can be used to measure photophysical properties of the chromophore in cortical skull bones, being a sensitive marker of bone diseases, namely, osteoporosis and cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ESame topicOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207