MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1968493347 · doi:10.1139/z00-222

Concentrations of electrolytes, hormones, and other constituents in fresh postmortem blood and urine of fin whales (<i>Balaenoptera physalus</i>)

2001· article· en· W1968493347 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Matthı́as Kjeld

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Zoology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine animal studies overview
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyBalaenopteraUrineSeawaterWhaleEndocrinologyAnimal scienceInternal medicineEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Concentrations of various blood and urine constituents were measured on postmortem samples from 286 fin whales (Balaenoptera physalus) caught off Iceland during the summers of 1981–1989. Measurements were carried out on both serum and urine from 21 whales so that results could be compared. The mean serum urea concentration in fin whales was similar to that in odontocetes but 5 times higher than in domesticated terrestrial mammals. Serum triglyceride concentrations were twice as high as in fasting man and showed no diurnal peaks. Serum cortisol concentrations were about 2 times lower than in domestic mammals and showed neither diurnal variation nor a significant correlation with chase time (time from sighting until killing). Serum aldosterone concentrations were similar to those in bottlenose dolphins and, as expected, showed a negative correlation with urinary Na+concentration. Blood thyroxine levels correlated significantly (p < 0.003) with chase time. Mean urinary potassium concentrations were 6 times higher than average seawater levels, while sodium and chloride levels were about 2–3 times higher than in humans but never as high as those in seawater. Urinary magnesium levels were 4–5 times higher than in domestic animals but less than half those in seawater. Average urine osmolality was higher than in seawater.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Zoology→Same topicMarine animal studies overview→French-language works237,207→