MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968523822 · doi:10.1159/000131887

Correlates of the Perceived Need for Institutionalisation among Older Adults without Cognitive Impairment

2008· article· en· W1968523822 on OpenAlexafffund
Marie‐France Dubois, Nicole Dubuc, Michel Raı̂che, Chantal Caron, Réjean Hébert

Bibliographic record

VenueGerontology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsInstitutionalisationDementiaGerontologyLogistic regressionPsychologyCognitionCognitive declineCognitive impairmentMedicinePsychiatryDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: While many studies investigate the factors that influence the institutionalisation of older persons, only a few consider one of its most important predictors, namely, the perceived need for institutionalisation. Also referred to as 'desire for institutionalisation', it has mainly been investigated for informal caregivers of older adults suffering from dementia. Not many studies target caregivers of people without dementia; even fewer have been interested in the older adult's own perceived need. OBJECTIVE: To measure the prevalence and identify the correlates of the perceived need for institutionalisation among community-dwelling older adults without cognitive impairment. METHODS: During the fourth wave of the longitudinal PRISMA study, cognitive-impairment-free participants (78 years or older and at risk of functional decline) were presented with three questions assessing their perceived need for institutionalisation. Correlates were identified through multivariable logistic regression analyses. Analyses were conducted separately for two types of home living arrangements: individual and collective dwellings. RESULTS: 27% of the older adults at least thought about institutionalisation, irrespective of their current living arrangements. For homeowners/tenants, age ranging from 80 to 85, transfer and vision problems, the absence or advanced age of the informal caregiver, and the use of the ER or help for home maintenance during the past year led them to think about institutionalisation. Seniors living in collective dwellings think about institutionalisation after experiencing a recent highly significant functional decline, when feeling that their current environment fails to meet needs, and after requiring the use of voluntary services during the past year. CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of community-dwelling older adults considering institutionalisation is the same for people currently in individual or collective settings. Factors related to physical disabilities and insufficiencies of resources are important correlates, with specific factors differing between the two types of current living arrangements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.301

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGerontologySame topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFrench-language works237,207