MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968707449 · doi:10.2174/1874437001408010174

Microscopic Investigation on Fungal Pigment Formation and its Morphology in Wood Substrates

2014· article· en· W1968707449 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Open Mycology Journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrobial Metabolism and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMorphology (biology)PigmentMaterials sciencePolymer scienceNanotechnologyChemistryBiologyZoologyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Melanin formation and assembly by fungi has largely been investigated mainly for its importance in pathogenesis, as well as to establish the functions and biosynthetic pathways of melanin formed during the process of successional wood decay. It is known that melanin formation varies based on fungal species, especially melanin produced by ascomycetes versus basidiomycetes, and that the mechanisms of melanin production by basidiomycetes are more complex and thus far not entirely elucidated. This study compares in vivo melanin formation by Oxyporus populinus in sugar maple and Fomes fomentarius in birch, and in vitro pigmentation by Trametes versicolor, Xylaria polymorpha and Inonotus hispidus in sugar maple and beech, with and without the influence of the melanin precursor, catechol. The results of this research indicate a bi-or multi-modal activity of melanin production and assembly by wood decay fungi, and identify possible variations in melanin formation mechanisms as influenced by fungal and wood species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.091
Threshold uncertainty score0.225

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it