Poster — Thur Eve — 31: RapidArc total body photon irradiation: A feasibility study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Total body photon irradiation (TBI) may be delivered with a number of standard techniques, typically using extended SSD geometries to obtain large field sizes. Since 1982 we have treated over 620 patients (adult and pediatric) mostly in the floor-located prone/supine treatment position with AP/PA beams using a column mounted 4 MV linac, and more recently with a fixed field, extended SSD, Cobalt teletherapy unit. This treatment position has many advantages for TBI including ease of delivery (especially for pediatric or compromised patients), improved dose uniformity, simplicity for partial or complete organ shielding, and imaging capabilities to name a few. In an effort to transfer this technique to a conventional isocentric linac, we have undertaken a feasibility study for RapidArc based extended SSD total body irradiation. Proof of principle was first explored using the DBD (Dynamic Beam Delivery) toolbox to configure a 6 MV beam with an 80 degree arc, centered on the 12 o'clock gantry angle with a sliding-window beam. This was followed by the development of an ECLIPSE generated 80 degree RapidArc plan. Initial measurements were conducted with a Varian 21EX using the 6 MV DBD beam to explore characteristics such as PDD, surface dose, off-axis ratios, output, dose per MU, and linearity. Subsequently ECLIPSE generated RapidArc TBI plans using similar partial arcs were also evaluated. Encouraged by our results, we believe this technique shows potential for making floor-located AP/PA total body photon irradiation possible for any standard RapidArc enabled isocentric linac.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".