Thermal Evolution of Acetic Acid Nanodeposits over 123−180 K on Noncrystalline Ice and Polycrystalline Ice Studied by FTIR Reflection−Absorption Spectroscopy: Hydrogen-bonding Interactions in Acetic Acid and between Acetic Acid and Ice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acetic acid vapor-deposited on ultrathin noncrystalline ice (NCI) and polycrystalline ice (PCI) films (less than 6 nm thick) under ultrahigh vacuum conditions has been investigated by using Fourier Transform Infrared Reflection-Absorption Spectroscopy. Pristine acetic acid deposited at 123 K (on a copper support) appears as an amorphous solid, which undergoes an irreversible phase transformation to a more structurally ordered (polycrystalline) form upon annealing to 153 K. Acetic acid is found to adsorb on NCI and PCI films initially through hydrogen bonding between C=O and dangling OH (of ice), followed by the formation of multilayers at 123 K. Thermal evolution studies of a low exposure of acetic acid on the ultrathin NCI and PCI films show that acetic acid undergoes coevaporation with water likely as an acetic acid hydrate at 155 K, which continues until the entire ice film has been exhausted at 165 K. Above 165 K, the remaining acetic acid solid appears to evaporate without undergoing the phase transformation, in contrast to the case of a high acetic acid exposure. Coevaporation of acetic acid with water is also found to proceed at a faster rate than the subsequent evaporation of acetic acid, which is consistent with the weaker interactions observed in the H-bonded acetic acid hydrate than that in acetic acid solid.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".