Instability of St. John's Wort (<i>Hypericum perforatum </i>L.) and Degradation of Hyperforin in Aqueous Solutions and Functional Beverage
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Several bioactive botanicals including St. John's wort (SJW; Hypericum perforatum L.) have been used to formulate functional foods and beverages. This study aimed to investigate the stability of SJW components in aqueous solutions and fruit-flavored drinks. Changes of active marker components (hypericin, pseudohypericin, hyperforin, and adhyperforin) as affected by pH and light exposure were determined by HPLC, and the degradation of hyperforin was analyzed by LC-MS/MS and NMR. SJW components were found to be unstable in acidic aqueous solutions. More changes occurred under light exposure, with hyperforin and adhyperforin decreasing the most. Less severe changes were observed in the drink sample as compared to the pH 2.65 solution. Major degradation products of hyperforin in acidic aqueous solutions were identified as furohyperforin, furohyperforin hydroperoxide, and furohyperforin isomer a. The latter was also found in the drink product containing SJW as an ingredient. Biological activities and potential quality and safety implications of these chemical changes are yet to be evaluated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it