POTENTIAL ROLE OF 18FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE–POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY/COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IN DIFFERENTIATING BENIGN NEUROFIBROMA FROM MALIGNANT PERIPHERAL NERVE SHEATH TUMOR ASSOCIATED WITH NEUROFIBROMATOSIS 1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Benign plexiform neurofibromas (PNfib), especially those occurring in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1, are at a significant risk of progressing to a malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST). Early diagnosis, followed by radical surgery and adjuvant radiation to maintain local tumor control, is of critical importance to prevent metastasis and subsequent mortality from MPNSTs. However, early diagnosis is hampered by the sensitivity of current imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging to reliably detect this malignant transformation, which can occur heterogeneously in a PNfib to a MPNST. 18Fluorodeoxyglucose (18FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) is linked to metabolism and proliferation of tissues and has been widely used in oncology including PNSTs. 18FDG-PET/CT has the added advantage of fusing metabolic and anatomic imaging data sets. METHODS: In this prospective study, 9 neurofibromatosis type 1-associated PNfibs suspected to have undergone transformation to an MPNST were preoperatively evaluated by 18FDG-PET/CT and magnetic resonance imaging. A detailed histological evaluation correlated the average and regional standard uptake value (SUV) from the 18FDG-PET/CT to grade of malignancy of the suspected MPNST. RESULTS: Imaging from 18FDG-PET/CT and associated SUV of the suspected MPNSTs demonstrated either a homogeneous or a heterogeneous pattern. Stratification of the maximal SUV to low (<4.0), intermediate (4.0-7.0), or high (>7.0) correlated to the proliferative index (Ki-67) and grade of MPNST. A maximal SUV of more than 7.0 was closely correlated to a focus of malignant transformation. CONCLUSION: This study, on a limited number of cases, demonstrates the potential use of 18FDG-PET/CT to augment management of PNfibs, especially in the context of neurofibromatosis type 1, which is characterized by multiple tumors. The addition of CT anatomic imaging to 18FGD-PET can facilitate targeting biopsies to metabolic hot spots, to further augment diagnostic sensitivity. Much larger numbers of MPNSTs, which can only be accrued in a collaborative manner among institutions, are required to further assess the specificity and sensitivity of 18FDG-PET/CT in the diagnosis of MPNSTs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".