MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1968825904 · doi:10.4141/a05-034

Utilization of fortified cubes to deliver trace minerals and monensin in forage-based diets

2006· article· en· W1968825904 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Kim Ominski, D. A. Boadi, K. M. Wittenberg

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Animal Science · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersUniversity of Manitoba
KeywordsMonensinAnimal scienceIce calvingForageDry matterTrace mineralHayChemistryBiologyLactationAgronomyPregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The potential benefits of mineral or monensin delivery through forage cubes vs. free-choice were investigated in Simmental × Charolais pregnant cows and their calves. Thirty-six mid-gestation cows (615 ± 21 kg) placed in 18 pens were initially depleted of liver Cu reserves by feeding a TMR containing 100 mg Mo kg-1 DM and 4 g S kg-1 DM for 42 d, allowed to stabilize on a low Mo, Cu and S diet for 42 d and were then used in a mineral uptake study. Experimental diets containing chopped grass-hay were fed ad libitum with one of the following three alfalfa-barley grain cubes at 2 kg head-1 d-1: (1) no addition of mineral and ionophore (Free Choice); (2) addition of mineral and no ionophore (+M Cube); and (3) addition of mineral and ionophore in the form of monensin (+M+I Cube). Mineral intake and mineral status (through liver biopsy and blood sampling) were monitored over a 16-wk feeding period, which included the first 6 wk post-calving. Dry matter intake by Free Choice cows prior to calving was higher than that by +M Cube and +M+I Cube fed cows (P < 0.05). Pre- and post-calving mineral intake (g pen-1 d -1) by Free Choice cows was 31.6% higher than +M Cube and +M+I Cube fed cows (P < 0.01). The coefficient of variation for day-to-day and pen-to-pen variation for cows consuming free choice mineral was 81 and 36%, respectively. There was no variation in supplemental mineral intake for +M Cube and +M+I Cube fed cows due to complete consumption of all forage cubes offered. Dietary treatment did not influence mean serum Cu and Zn concentration or plasma ceruloplasmin oxidase (Cp) activity of cows (P > 0.05). However, liver Cu concentration (mg kg-1) of +M+I Cube fed cows tended to be higher than for the other treatment groups (P = 0.06). Calf ADG at 6 wk of age was not affected by dietary treatment of dams (P > 0.05). Copper and Zn status of calves at 6 wk of age was not different among dam dietary treatments. However, plasma Cp activity declined more rapidly in +M+I Cube calves compared with +M Cube calves (P < 0.05), which may be attributed to the presence of monensin in the +M+I Cube diet of late gestation cows. Fortified cubes may be used as an effective means of eliminating the variability in mineral intake associated with free choice consumption with no detrimental effect on mineral status of cows and their suckling calves. Key words: Forage cubes, trace minerals, monensin, pregnant cows, calves

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2006
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Animal Science→Same topicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology→French-language works237,207→