Laboratory device to characterize electrokinetic geocomposites for fluid fine tailings dewatering
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The oil sands industry usually leads to the production of large quantities of mineral waste, such as fluid fine tailings (FFT), whose disposal is often challenging. Electrokinetic geocomposites (eGCPs) installed into the FFT disposal area may improve in situ dewatering, as eGCPs can drain water expulsed during FFT consolidation as well as impose a voltage across FFT to displace water by electro-osmosis. This paper presents a laboratory device specifically developed to evaluate eGCP performance for sludge dewatering. Based on the oedometer principle, the device aims at studying sludge consolidation as a function of boundary conditions (mechanical stress and (or) voltage), with drainage and electrical conduction ensured by two eGCPs positioned on both sides of the sludge layer. Preliminary results obtained with one particular eGCP are presented: the solids content was increased from 42% to 66%, which led to a significant improvement of the shear strength from nearly 0 kPa to a mean value of 40 kPa. The energy required for this experiment was 71 W·h (3.5 kW·h/(m 3 of sludge)). The filtration performance remained satisfactory; the sludge particles were retained upstream of the filter, with clean water flowing through.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it