NMR Conformational Analyses on (des-bromo) Neuropeptide B [1–23] and Neuropeptide W [1–23]: The Importance of α-helices, a Cation-π Interaction and a β-Turn
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The preferred conformations of the orphan G-protein coupled receptor agonists (des-bromo) neuropeptide B [1-23] and neuropeptide W [1-23], referred to as NPB and NPW, have been determined by (1)H NMR, CD, and molecular modeling. The sequences of NPB and NPW are WYKPAAGHSSYSVGRAAGLLSGL and WYKHVASPRYHTVGRAAGLLMGL, respectively. These are hypothalamic peptides that exert their biological actions on GPR7 and GPR8 receptors. Micellar solutions using the membrane mimetic, sodium dodecylsulphate-d(25) (SDS), were used to mimic a physiological environment for the peptides. The secondary structure of NPB consists of a type II beta-turn involving residues Lys(3) to Ala(6). The C-terminal region of NPB exists in a conformational equilibrium between different secondary structures, including an alpha-helix from residues Arg(15) to Ser(21), and a 3(10)-helix from residues Ser(12) to Ser(21). The N-terminus of NPW exhibits a cation-pi interaction between the Lys(3) side chain and the quadrupole moment of the Trp(1) indole group. At the C-terminus of NPW, a well-defined alpha-helical conformation exists from Arg(15) to Met(21). As NPB and NPW have 91% sequence homology from residues Val(13) to Leu(23), with only residue 21 differing between the two peptides, the similar C-terminal secondary structures of these two peptides are consistent with the sequences. This is supported by the similar CD spectra. The different secondary structures at the N-termini for NPB and NPW point to the importance of the N-terminus in receptor binding. This is consistent with the work of Fujii et al. [J. Biol. Chem. 277, 34010-34016 (2002)] who observed that iodination of the NPB Tyr(2) resulted in decreased agonistic activity at GPR7. In addition, Tanaka et al. [Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 6251-6256 (2003)] showed that deletion of Trp(1) from NPB or NPW drastically decreased activity at GPR7 for NPB and GPR7 and GPR8 for NPW. Therefore, we postulate that the N-terminus is involved in membrane recognition and receptor binding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".