MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Characterization of Proline, Citrulline, and Uracil Auxotrophic Plasmid-Carrying Neisseria gonorrhoeae Strains in Canada, 1993–2003

2006· article· en· W1968916205 on OpenAlexaffabout
Lai-King Ng, Allan Lau, Irene Martín, Raymond S. W. Tsang

Bibliographic record

VenueSexually Transmitted Diseases · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicReproductive tract infections research
Canadian institutionsPublic Health Agency of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrobiologyPlasmidNeisseria gonorrhoeaeAuxotrophyTetracyclineBiologyAntimicrobialSerotypePenicillinAntibioticsGeneEscherichia coliGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Brief Background and Objective: Proline, citrulline, and uracil (PCU−) Neisseria gonorrhoeae is a common auxotroph in Canada and resistance to antibiotics in this auxotroph is rare. Goal: The goal of this study was to determine the characteristics of the PCU− strains that have plasmids. Study Design: PCU− strains sent between 1993 and 2003 for reference work to the National Microbiology Laboratory were analyzed for their plasmid profiles and antimicrobial susceptibilities. PCU− strains containing plasmids and/or antimicrobial resistant were serotyped, and por and tbpB genes were sequenced to determine their antigenic types. Results: Forty strains containing plasmids were identified; serotype IB-11 and por/tbpB sequence type 2 was the most common pattern (28 of 40 strains [70%]). One strain had plasmids that conferred resistance to penicillin and tetracycline and 4 plasmidless strains were resistant to tetracycline. Conclusion: PCU− auxotrophic N. gonorrhoeae carrying plasmids and/or that have chromosomal genes mutated to resist antimicrobials have been identified in Canada. This shows the competency of this pathogen to survive under antimicrobial pressure and the importance of continuous surveillance. Characterization of proline, citrulline, and uracil requiring auxotrophs of Neisseria gonorrhoeae strains collected during 1993–2003 showed some of these strains either contained plasmids or had chromosomal and/or plasmid-mediated resistance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.772
Threshold uncertainty score0.967

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSexually Transmitted DiseasesSame topicReproductive tract infections researchFrench-language works237,207