Foraminifer test preservation and diagenesis: comparison of high latitude Eocene sites
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Foraminifer tests are prone to diagenetic recrystallization on a micron scale that can affect their geochemical composition, hence it is important to identify fossil material that is well-preserved. Here we illustrate the textures of tests from several high-latitude Eocene sites using a combination of Reflected Light Microscopy and high-resolution Scanning Electron Microscopy. The sites are Ocean Drilling Program (ODP) Site 647 in the Labrador Sea (53°N), ODP Site 689 at Maud Rise in the Weddell Sea (64°S), ODP Site 1135 (Kerguelen Plateau c . 59°S) and outcrop samples from Hampden Beach, New Zealand (palaeolatitude c . 55°S). The foraminifera studied from Site 647 and Hampden Beach have glassy, transparent tests that show only minor signs of diagenetic alteration, whereas the foraminifera from Sites 690 and 1135 are opaque and recrystallized. We associate the better state of foraminifer preservation at the former sites with the high clay content of the sediments. Our observations suggest that Site 647 and Hampden Beach may be useful for the establishment of high-latitude sea-surface temperatures and hence global temperature gradients in the Eocene.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".