MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968931648 · doi:10.1144/sp303.5

Foraminifer test preservation and diagenesis: comparison of high latitude Eocene sites

2008· article· en· W1968931648 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paul N. Pearson, Catherine E Burgess

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Society London Special Publications · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyDiagenesisPaleontologyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Foraminifer tests are prone to diagenetic recrystallization on a micron scale that can affect their geochemical composition, hence it is important to identify fossil material that is well-preserved. Here we illustrate the textures of tests from several high-latitude Eocene sites using a combination of Reflected Light Microscopy and high-resolution Scanning Electron Microscopy. The sites are Ocean Drilling Program (ODP) Site 647 in the Labrador Sea (53°N), ODP Site 689 at Maud Rise in the Weddell Sea (64°S), ODP Site 1135 (Kerguelen Plateau c . 59°S) and outcrop samples from Hampden Beach, New Zealand (palaeolatitude c . 55°S). The foraminifera studied from Site 647 and Hampden Beach have glassy, transparent tests that show only minor signs of diagenetic alteration, whereas the foraminifera from Sites 690 and 1135 are opaque and recrystallized. We associate the better state of foraminifer preservation at the former sites with the high clay content of the sediments. Our observations suggest that Site 647 and Hampden Beach may be useful for the establishment of high-latitude sea-surface temperatures and hence global temperature gradients in the Eocene.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations57
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeological Society London Special PublicationsSame topicGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchFrench-language works237,207