MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Fungal prophylaxis in biliopancreatic surgery in immunocompromised patients

2000· article· en· W1969002789 on OpenAlexaff
C Emparan, I. Iturburu, Javier Díaz-Aguirregoitia, Z T Beyga, L F Perdigo

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish journal of surgery · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia detection and treatment
Canadian institutionsPancreas Centre (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePerioperativePancreas transplantationImmunosuppressionSurgeryChemoprophylaxisAntibiotic prophylaxisTransplantationIncidence (geometry)Kidney transplantationInternal medicineAntibiotics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Fungal infection is a devastating complication with an increased incidence in the past decade. Immune-depressed patients undergoing high-risk procedures have an increased incidence of surgical infection, particularly due to fungal colonization. Methods Twenty patients undergoing pancreas transplantation, 20 kidney transplant patients undergoing biliary tract surgery, 20 patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) undergoing biliary tract surgery and 20 patients undergoing pancreatic resection for neoplasms were enrolled in a prospective study concerning perioperative surgical infection. All patients underwent surgical procedures by the same surgeon. All had preoperative blood counts, assay of CD lymphocyte populations, complete nutritional evaluation and similar antibiotic prophylaxis. Perioperative care was done to a similar standard and only patients undergoing pancreas transplantation received fungal prophylaxis (nystatin wash and swallow). In patients with clinical signs of infection, cultures were sent with special consideration to fungal infection. Results Two of the patients undergoing pancreas transplantation (one of whom died from disseminated candidiasis), three of the kidney transplant patients (two on the wound, one in the catheter), three patients with HIV (two on bile culture, one in the bloodstream) and one of the patients undergoing pancreatic resection (pancreatic fistula and bloodstream) had fungal infection. All patients had concomitant bacterial infections at the time of fungal infection (60 per cent Staphylococcus epidermidis). Patients with fungal infection had increased levels of immunosuppression with decreased CD4 recounts (pancreas transplants and patients with HIV), increased perioperative levels of blood glucose requiring insulin treatment, prolonged antibiotic therapy with broad-spectrum antibiotics (piperacillin–tazobactam), previous positive cultures from the bile of the biliary tract or the duodenum of the transplanted pancreas, and concomitant bacterial infections (especially opportunistic). Conclusion Surgical patients with positive cultures from surgical specimens, prolonged broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy and severely decreased lymphocyte immune function had an increased incidence of fungal infection with significant morbidity and mortality rates. Fungal prophylaxis is strongly recommended in these high-risk patients undergoing biliopancreatic tract surgery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.354
Threshold uncertainty score0.720

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish journal of surgerySame topicPneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia detection and treatmentFrench-language works237,207