Photoelectron spectroscopic determination of the energy bandwidths of high-order harmonics (7th–55th) produced by an ultrafast laser in neon
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The energy bandwidths of high-order harmonics of a Ti:sapphire ultrafast laser are extracted from electron kinetic-energy measurements of the photoionization of gas-phase atoms and molecules. High-order harmonics of the 70 fs, 800 nm laser are produced by focusing $\ensuremath{\approx}2.5 \mathrm{mJ}$ pulses into a jet of neon gas and are frequency-separated by a grazing-incidence grating. Photoelectrons resulting from the ionization of gaseous samples are energy-analyzed with a magnetic bottle time-of-flight spectrometer. Energy broadening of the photoelectron peaks at low kinetic energies are a direct result of the energy bandwidths of the harmonics. The energy bandwidths of the harmonics are found to increase from $0.11(\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.03) \mathrm{eV}$ (7th harmonic) to $0.37(\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.03) \mathrm{eV}$ (45th harmonic) in a gradual manner. The higher-order harmonics (47th--55th) appear to reach a plateau at a value of $\ensuremath{\approx}0.43 \mathrm{eV}.$ Though a full theoretical treatment of bandwidths of the harmonics for the 70 fs driving pulse regime does not exist, the theories developed for shorter pulses $(<~30 \mathrm{fs})$ can give insight into the observed results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".