MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1969059213 · doi:10.1002/pssc.200881272

Observation of <sup>4</sup>F<sub>3/2</sub>→<sup>4</sup>I<sub>15/2</sub> radiative transition in Nd<sup>3+</sup> ions in GaLaS glass using frequency‐resolved PL spectroscopy

2009· article· en· W1969059213 on OpenAlexafffund
Takeshi Aoki, K. Koughia, Kazuhiro J. Fujimoto, Chugo Fujihashi, R. G. DeCorby, C.J. Haugen, Daniel W. Hewak, D. Tonchev, Safa Kasap

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysica status solidi. C, Conferences and critical reviews/Physica status solidi. C, Current topics in solid state physics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLuminescence Properties of Advanced Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhotoluminescenceRadiative transferAtomic physicsSpectroscopyIonPhysicsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Relaxation (psychology)ChemistryOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The photoluminescence (PL) emission band corresponding to 4 F 3/2 → 4 I 15/2 transition has been revealed using a double lock‐in technique and quadrature frequency resolved spectroscopy (QFRS) at room temperature in Nd 3+ in a GaLaS glass. The band is centred around 1840 nm and has a lifetime ∼77 μs, which seems to be the same for all four radiative transitions 4 F 3/2 → 4 I J ( J = 9/2, 11/2, 13/2 and 15/2). The branching ratios β J of the four above transitions have been estimated from the PL data and agree well with the results of Judd‐Ofelt (JO) analysis. In addition to the 1840 nm band, we have observed another PL band appearing around 1580 nm and having a dominant lifetime ∼3.8 μs. This band may be identified with the radiative transition from the doublet ( 4 F 5/2 , 2 H 9/2 ) to the 4 I 15/2 manifold. The short lifetime ∼3.8 μs may be caused by effective multiphonon relaxation from the doublet to the 4 F 3/2 manifold. (© 2009 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA, Weinheim)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.190
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysica status solidi. C, Conferences and critical reviews/Physica status solidi. C, Current topics in solid state physicsSame topicLuminescence Properties of Advanced MaterialsFrench-language works237,207