MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1969161365 · doi:10.2118/124002-ms

CO2-ECBM/Storage Activities at the San Juan Basin's Pump Canyon Test Site

2009· article· en· W1969161365 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
George Koperna, Anne Oudinot, Glenn R. McColpin, Ning Liu, Jason E. Heath, Arthur W. Wells, G. B. C. Young

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Energy Technology LaboratoryConocoPhillipsU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsCanyonCarbon sequestrationEnvironmental scienceCoalbed methaneGreenhouse gasStructural basinCoalCoal miningPetroleum engineeringGeologyMining engineeringEngineeringCarbon dioxideWaste managementGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Southwest Regional Partnership on Carbon Sequestration (SWP) is one of seven regional partnerships sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) that collectively includes more than 350 organizations spanning 40 states, three Indian nations, and four Canadian provinces. The objectives are to determine the most suitable technologies, regulations and infrastructure requirements for carbon capture, storage and sequestration in different areas of the country. In Phase I of the partnership program, significant sources of greenhouse gas emissions were inventoried, potential geological sequestration sinks identified, and small-scale sequestration demonstration opportunities developed. Many of these small-scale pilot demonstrations are currently being implemented as part of the Phase II program. One of the three geo-sequestration pilots for the SWP involves CO2 injection into a deep, unmineable coalbed at the Pump Canyon site located in the San Juan Basin of northern New Mexico. At the demonstration site, a new CO2 injection well was drilled into the late-Cretaceous Fruitland coals within an existing pattern of coalbed methane production wells. CO2 is currently being injected into the coal at pressures not to exceed the permitted injection pressure, and a variety of monitoring, verification and accounting (MVA) methods are employed to track the movement of the CO2. Some of the MVA methods include continuous measurement of injection volumes, pressures and temperatures within the injection well, coalbed methane production rates, pressures and compositions at the offset producer wells, tracers in the injected CO2, time-lapse vertical seismic profiling, surface tiltmeter arrays, a series of shallow monitoring wells with a regular fluid sampling program, and surface measurements of soil compositions, CO2 fluxes, tracers, etc. In addition, a detailed geologic characterization and reservoir modeling has been implemented in order to reproduce and understand the behavior of the reservoir. To date, the injection is still on-going and no CO2 breakthrough has occurred. This paper provides a description of the Pump Canyon CO2-ECBM (enhanced coalbed methane) and sequestration demonstration field activities with particular emphasis on the lessons being learned.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.695
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Annual Technical Conference and ExhibitionSame topicCO2 Sequestration and Geologic InteractionsFrench-language works237,207