The crystal structure of tedhadleyite, Hg<sup>2+</sup>Hg<sub>10</sub><sup>1+</sup>O<sub>4</sub>l<sub>2</sub>(Cl,Br)<sub>2</sub>, from the Clear Creek Claim, San Benito County, California
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The crystal structure of tedhadleyite, ideally Hg2+Hg101+O4l2(Cl,Br)2,triclinic, AĪ, a 7.0147(5), b 11.8508(7), c 12.5985(8) Å, α 115.583(5), β 82.575(2), γ 100.619(2)º, V 927.0(2) Å3, Z = 2,was solved by direct methods and refined to an R1 index of 4.5% for 2677 unique reflections. There are six symmetrically distinct Hg sites in tedhadleyite: Hg(1) is occupied by Hg2+ and Hg(2–6) are occupied by Hg+ that forms three [Hg–Hg]2+ dimers with Hg–Hg separations between 2.527 and 2.556 Å. These [Hg–Hg]2+ dimers have strong covalent bonds to O atoms,forming pseudo-linear O–Hg–Hg–O arrangements,and weak bonds to halogen and O atoms at high angles to the dimer axis. The [O–Hg–Hg-O] groups share anions to form four-membered square rings of composition [Hg8O4] that link along [100] via [O–Hg–Hg-O] groups and along [001] via [O–Hg–O] groups, forming rectangular rings of composition [Hg14O8]. The rings form a corrugated layer that interweaves with a symmetrically related layer whereby the [O–Hg(6)–Hg(6)–O] linking groups of one layer pass through the centres of the square [Hg8O4] rings of the other layer to form [Hg11O4] complex slabs parallel to (010) that link through Hg-I and Hg-Br,Cl bonds.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".