MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1969237548 · doi:10.1002/gps.1864

Patterns of decline and evidence of subgroups in patients with Alzheimer's disease taking galantamine for up to 48 months

2007· article· en· W1969237548 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Kenneth Rockwood, Dingwei Dai, Arnold Mitnitski

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersDalhousie Medical Research Foundation
KeywordsGalantamineDementiaInternal medicinePlaceboMedicineCognitionLogistic regressionAlzheimer's diseasePsychologyDiseaseDonepezilPsychiatryPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Lacking long-term placebo-controlled trials of cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) in Alzheimer's disease, how decline is modeled is crucial to interpreting the effects of long-term, open-label use. We aimed to: 1) understand changes in cognition and function in people taking galantamine; (2) identify treatment subgroups. METHODS: This is an open-label long-term extension (up to 48 months) of two placebo-controlled clinical trials from Europe and Canada. At baseline, 240 patients with mild-moderate Alzheimer's disease at baseline had received galantamine continuously for 36 months. The trajectory of scores on the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) and the Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD) was modeled over 48 months. Goodness of fit was compared using normalized residuals and by calculating correlation coefficients between observed and fitted data. Iterative K-means clustering identified subgroups. RESULTS: Of 240 patients, 51 (21%) withdrew between months 36-48 (nine died and 12 with adverse events). The mean ADAS-Cog worsened from 22.6 (mean)+/-8.6 (SD) at baseline to 31.3+/-3.1, with similar changes in the DAD. The logistic function fit better (ADAS-Cog norm of residuals=2.05, r=0.993; DAD=2.21, r=0.998) than the commonly used Stern equation (ADAS-Cog=4.22, r=0.944; DAD=7.51, r=0.986). K-means clustering identified three stable groups; least decline (n=82), persistent progression (n=75), and an intermediate group (n=82). Initial conditions were important: the mean ADAS-Cog score for those with least decline was 15+/-8, better than both the intermediate group (20+/-9) and persistent progressors (30+/-10; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Alzheimer's disease patients show variable long-term decline that is best modeled as a logistic function, not as linear decline. Over 48 months, about one-third of patients showed little decline, while one-third showed important decline.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2007
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Geriatric PsychiatrySame topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFrench-language works237,207