MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1969300761 · doi:10.1021/ac000154x

Uncompensated Resistance. 2. The Effect of Reference Electrode Nonideality

2000· article· en· W1969300761 on OpenAlexafffund
Keith B. Oldham, Nicholas Stevens

Bibliographic record

VenueAnalytical Chemistry · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicElectrochemical Analysis and Applications
Canadian institutionsTrent University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsElectrodeReference electrodeChemistryWorking electrodeStandard hydrogen electrodeInsulator (electricity)Auxiliary electrodeElectromagnetic shieldingShielding effectAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Composite materialMaterials scienceElectrochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A finite-element simulation study has been made of the effect upon the uncompensated resistance, U, of the size of a reference electrode positioned at various distances above the center of an inlaid-disk working electrode. The idealized reference electrode is treated as a conducting circular disk embedded in a cylindrical insulator. Two effects are encountered, in addition to the expected diminution in U as the reference electrode approaches the working electrode. A "backwater effect", reducing U, arises from the avoidance of the Luggin probe by the current lines. A "short-circuiting" effect, enhancing U, arises if those current lines pass through the reference electrode on their way to the counter electrode. Two detrimental effects of the intrusion of a finite-sized reference electrode into the vicinity of the working electrode--a reduction in the total current and the perturbation of the current density distribution-are also briefly examined. It is demonstrated that U may be reduced indefinitely by decreasing the working-to-reference gap, but, the Luggin probe must have a diameter of one-fourth or less of that of the working electrode if significant shielding is to be avoided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.211
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnalytical ChemistrySame topicElectrochemical Analysis and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207