Sequential Anaerobic−Aerobic Treatment of Soil Contaminated with Weathered Aroclor 1260
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Soil contaminated with weathered Aroclor 1260 was bioremediated by sequential anaerobic and aerobic laboratory-scale treatment. The initial concentration was 59 microg of PCBs/g of soil. Following 4 months of anaerobic treatment with an enrichment culture, all of the major components in Aroclor 1260 were completely or partially transformed to less chlorinated PCB congeners. The major products of reductive dechlorination were 24-24-tetrachlorobiphenyl and 24-26-tetrachlorobiphenyl, and the average chlorine substituents per PCB molecule decreased from 6.4 to 5.2. The molar concentration of PCBs did not decrease during the anaerobic treatment. All of the major products formed during the anaerobic treatmentwere degraded in the subsequent aerobic treatment using Burkholderia sp. strain LB400. After 28 days of the aerobic treatment, the concentration of PCBs was reduced to 20 ug/g of soil. PCBs were not significantly removed in aerobic treatments unless they were bioaugmented with LB400. Also, PCB degradation was not detected in soil bioaugmented with LB400 without prior anaerobic treatment. These results confirm the potential for extensive biological destruction of highly chlorinated, weathered PCB congeners in soil.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".