Synthetic Thermoreversible Polymers Are Compatible with Osteoinductive Activity of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 (rhBMP-2) is currently in clinical studies as part of an implantable device that contains a biomaterial carrier. Implant retention of rhBMP-2 by the biomaterial carrier is important for the osteoinductive activity. To control in situ retention of rhBMP-2, thermoreversible polymers were synthesized and characterized, and their compatibility with rhBMP-2-induced osteoinduction was investigated. The results indicated that polymers with a controlled "solubility <--> insolubility" transition temperature could be prepared from N-isopropylacrylamide, ethylmethacrylate, and N-acryloxysuccinimide (NASI). NASI-containing polymers were able to conjugate to rhBMP-2 without additional cross-linkers. Implantation in the rat ectopic model, where alkaline phosphatase and calcium deposition were utilized as markers of osteoinductive activity, indicated that rhBMP-2 mixed with the polymers were effective for osteoinduction. Moreover, rhBMP-2 conjugated to the chosen polymers was as effective as native rhBMP-2 in inducing ALP activity and calcium deposition. We conclude that thermoreversible polymers are compatible with rhBMP-2-induced osteogenesis and can serve as novel biomaterials for rhBMP-2 delivery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".