MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1969364946 · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2010.02.1401

1621 EXERCISE PREVENTS BLADDER DYSFUNCTION IN THE TYPE 2 DIABETIC MOUSE MODEL

2010· article· en· W1969364946 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Manasi Vadhavkar, Lynn Stothers, Ismail Laher

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Urology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDiabetes mellitusType 2 diabetesUrologyAmbulatoryLower urinary tract symptomsUrinary incontinenceInternal medicineEndocrinologyProstate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

You have accessJournal of UrologyUrodynamics/Incontinence/Female Urology: Urodynamic Testing1 Apr 20101621 EXERCISE PREVENTS BLADDER DYSFUNCTION IN THE TYPE 2 DIABETIC MOUSE MODEL Manasi Vadhavkar, Lynn Stothers, and Ismail Laher Manasi VadhavkarManasi Vadhavkar More articles by this author , Lynn StothersLynn Stothers More articles by this author , and Ismail LaherIsmail Laher More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.02.1401AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Type 2 diabetes accounts for more than 90% of diabetes mellitus. Detrusor dysfunction is a frequent complication of diabetes and can lead to a variety of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Exercise is the initial recommended management strategy in many diabetics and has been shown to prevent or reduce muscle dysfunction in other areas of the body; but its effect on prevention of detrusor dysfunction is unknown. The objective of this study was to determine if the introduction of moderate exercise early in the onset of type 2 diabetes would prevent bladder dysfunction and reduce voiding frequency in the db/db mouse, a frequently used animal model of type 2 diabetes. METHODS A randomised trial of 24 db/db female mice (BKS. Cg-m+/+Leprdb/ J strain) and their age matched wild type controls (WT) were used. Mice were equally divided into sedentary and exercise groups. Exercise consisted of one hour daily treadmill drills for 8 weeks at a speed of 5.2 meters/min. Ambulatory urodynamic protocols using suprapubic cystostomy were performed with water infusion to observe for overactivity, functional volume and pressure flow in all cohorts. Pad voiding pattern tests, contractile strength and reactivity of isolated detrusor strips in WT and db/db mice, in both sedentary and exercise groups were compared pharmacologically. RESULTS Diabetes increased the frequency of voiding, bladder capacity and residual volume. Exercise decreased voiding frequency in db/db mice where the voiding frequency was 5.8 ± 0.5 (db/db exercise) vs.10.8 ± 1.1 (db/db control) (t-test, P < 0.001). In cystometric analysis, the bladder capacity of db/db sedentary mice was 0.27 ± 0.05 ml compared to 0.14 ± 0.02 ml in the db/db exercise group (t- test, P < 0.05). Micturition pressure was higher in the db/db sedentary mice (30.69 ± 1.51 cm H2O vs. 25.61 ± 1.13 cm H2O after exercise, t- test, P < 0.05). Isolated strips of bladder muscle from sedentary db/db mice were more responsive to carbachol than strips from db/db exercise mice. This moderate level of exercise did not alter the body weight or blood glucose levels of db/db mice. CONCLUSIONS Moderate routine exercise resulted in detrusor function in type 2 diabetic mice statically comparable to non diabetic controls. Reduced voiding frequency and improved urodynamic parameters including reduction in overactivity and improved emptying were observed benefits; complications of which were statistically higher in the sedentary diabetic group. These findings suggest a potentially preventable component to diabetic detrusor dysfunction which could form the foundation for human studies. Vancouver, Canada© 2010 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 183Issue 4SApril 2010Page: e626 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2010 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Manasi Vadhavkar More articles by this author Lynn Stothers More articles by this author Ismail Laher More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of UrologySame topicUrinary Bladder and Prostate ResearchFrench-language works237,207