Divergent Phenotypes of Vision and Accessory Visual Function in Mice with Visual Cycle Dysfunction (<i>Rpe65<sup><i>rd12</i></sup></i>) or Retinal Degeneration (<i>rd/rd</i>)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Tests of vision for mice remain limited and the visual phenotype of some retinal disorders in mice remain poorly understood. A novel assay of vision was used to determine how the form and extent of retinal disease affects visual phenotype in mice. METHODS: Retinal histology, the suppression of locomotion by light and visual guidance of locomotion, were assessed in mice with progressive photoreceptor degeneration (rd/rd) or visual cycle dysfunction (Rpe65 rd12). RESULTS: In wild-type mice, there was visual guidance of locomotor activity in dim light and suppression of activity (negative masking) in bright light. In rd/rd mice, vision was sufficient to guide locomotion at postnatal day (P)34 but was lost from P46 onward. In bright light rd/rd mice had enhanced negative masking. Although Rpe65 rd12 mice had no dim light response, with high illumination, vision was sufficient to guide locomotion at all ages tested. CONCLUSIONS: A major concern for gene and cell replacement therapies is the development of visual pathways through which restored retinal function can connect to visual centers of the brain. The residual retinal response to high illumination in Rpe65 rd12 mice translates into useful vision, and visual pathways remain functional--a prerequisite for restoring vision in disorders of the retina. Similarly, useful vision in young rd/rd mice shows that there is visual pathway function before photoreceptor degeneration and suggests the potential for early therapy. Together, these findings recommend observation of masking responses in the assessment of gene and cell replacement therapies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".