MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1969426606 · doi:10.1021/bi900531z

Unusual DNA−DNA Cross-Links between a Photolyase Deoxyribozyme, UV1C, and Its Bound Oligonucleotide Substrate

2009· article· en· W1969426606 on OpenAlexaff
Gurpreet S. Sekhon, Dipankar Sen

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeoxyribozymeDNAPhotolyaseOligonucleotideChemistryBiochemistryNucleic acidThymineDNA repair

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

UV1C is a photolyase deoxyribozyme that repairs thymine dimers in a DNA oligonucleotide substrate. We report that treatment with iodine generates specific DNA-DNA cross-links between UV1C and a bound substrate analogue, LDPs, in which a single phosphate at the photoreactivation site has been replaced with a phosphorothioate. Although iodine has been reported to generate lysine-cysteine cross-links within a protein, the formation of DNA-DNA cross-links is both unexpected and novel. We have used different mapping procedures to identify a number of bases located in loops of the G-quadruplex fold of UV1C as the sites for cross-linking with LDPs. Mutation of one cross-linking adenine, in particular, leads to a major reduction in UVIC's catalytic activity. A map of these contact cross-linking sites enables us to refine an earlier structural-topological model for the folded UV1C.LDPs complex. The surprising facility with which these novel contact cross-links can be generated between a nucleic acid enzyme and its substrate's reaction site opens up a powerful new approach to mapping the active sites of different ribozymes and deoxyribozymes as well as enabling the dissection of key contacts within RNA-protein complexes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistrySame topicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniquesFrench-language works237,207