MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1969445060 · doi:10.2136/sssaj2000.6462080x

Tillage Effects on Carbon Fluxes in Continuous Wheat and Fallow–Wheat Rotations

2000· article· en· W1969445060 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueSoil Science Society of America Journal · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTillageLoamAgronomyCrop residueEnvironmental scienceSummer fallowConventional tillageCropping systemPloughCrop rotationSoil carbonResidue (chemistry)Soil waterCropSoil scienceCroppingChemistryBiologyAgricultureEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The traditional cropping system in semiarid regions of the Canadian prairies involves frequent summer fallowing with several tillage operations to control weeds during the fallow period. Recently, there has been a trend toward reduced tillage and more intensive cropping, but the impact of this shift in management on sequestration of atmospheric CO 2 remains uncertain. In 1995 and 1996, we measured fluxes of CO 2 in a tillage experiment that had been initiated in 1982 on a silt loam (Typic Haploboroll) in southwestern Saskatchewan. The experiment comprised two spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) rotations (continuous wheat [Cont. W] and fallow–wheat [F–W]), each with conventional tillage (CT) and no‐till (NT) treatments. In Cont. W, CO 2 fluxes tended to be lower under NT than under CT (mean annual flux was ≈20 to 25% less for NT than CT). In F–W, tillage effects on mean annual CO 2 flux were significant ( P < 0.05) in the wheat phase only (NT ≈ 10% less than CT). Tillage had negligible effect on C inputs in crop residues. Lower CO 2 fluxes under NT than under CT were attributed to slower decomposition of crop residues placed on the surface of NT soil than when they were incorporated. With good growing conditions (and thus large inputs of residues) between 1989 and 1996, there was an accumulation of partially decomposed residues on the surface of NT soil. Carbon in surface residues represented about one‐half of the C gained by NT soil. In Cont. W, surface residue C (in 1996) amounted to 3.6 t ha −1 under NT vs 1.4 t ha −1 under CT. Residue C amounts were smaller in the F–W system: 1.7 t ha −1 (NT) and 0.7 t ha −1 (CT). Based on our results, producers on medium‐textured soils in the semiarid Canadian prairies who switch from the traditional wheat production system (conventionally tilled fallow–wheat) to continuous no‐till cropping could, potentially, sequester 5 to 6 t C ha −1 in soil organic matter and surface residues in 13 to 14 yr.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.886
Threshold uncertainty score0.262

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it