A Mechanism-Based ICAT Strategy for Comparing Relative Expression and Activity Levels of Glycosidases in Biological Systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An activity-based isotope-coded affinity tagging (AB-ICAT) strategy for proteome-wide quantitation of active retaining endoglycosidases has been developed. Two pairs of biotinylated, cleavable, AB-ICAT reagents (light H(8) and heavy D(8)) have been synthesized, one incorporating a recognition element for cellulases and the other incorporating a recognition element for xylanases. The accuracy of the AB-ICAT methodology in quantifying relative glycosidase expression/activity levels in any two samples of interest has been verified using several pairs of model enzyme mixtures where one or more enzyme amounts and/or activities were varied. The methodology has been applied to the biomass-degrading secretomes of the soil bacterium, Cellulomonas fimi, under induction by different polyglycan growth substrates to obtain a quantitative profile of the relative expression/activity levels of individual active retaining endoglycanases per C. fimi cell. Such biological profiles are valuable in understanding the strategies employed by biomass-degrading organisms in exploiting environments containing different biomass polysaccharides. This is the first report on the application of an activity-based ICAT method to a biological system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it