MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1969495305 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.66.054104

Phase diagram of the ferroelectric relaxor<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mn/><mml:mi>−</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PbMg</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nb</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi>−</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PbTiO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>

2002· article· lv· W1969495305 on OpenAlexaff
Beatriz Noheda, D. E. Cox, G. Shirane, Jinghui Gao, Zuo‐Guang Ye

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B, Condensed matter · 2002
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldMaterials Science
TopicFerroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersBrookhaven National LaboratoryOffice of Naval ResearchU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsTetragonal crystal systemMonoclinic crystal systemPhase diagramCrystallographyPhase boundaryFerroelectricityPhase (matter)PhysicsMaterials scienceType (biology)Condensed matter physicsCrystal structureChemistryQuantum mechanicsDielectric

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Synchrotron x-ray powder diffraction measurements have been performed on unpoled ceramic samples of $(1\ensuremath{-}x)\mathrm{Pb}({\mathrm{Mg}}_{1/3}{\mathrm{Nb}}_{2/3}){\mathrm{O}}_{3}\ensuremath{-}x{\mathrm{PbTiO}}_{3}$ (PMN-xPT) with $30%&lt;~x&lt;~39%$ as a function of temperature around the morphotropic phase boundary, which is the line separating the rhombohedral and tetragonal phases in the phase diagram. The experiments have revealed very interesting features previously unknown in this or related systems. The sharp and well-defined diffraction profiles observed at high and intermediate temperatures in the cubic and tetragonal phases, respectively, are in contrast to the broad features encountered at low temperatures. These peculiar characteristics, which are associated with the monoclinic phase of ${\mathrm{M}}_{C}$-type previously reported by Kiat et al. [Phys. Rev. B 65, 064106 (2000)] and Singh and Pandey [J. Phys. Condens Matter 13, L931 (2001)], can only be interpreted as multiple coexisting structures with ${\mathrm{M}}_{C}$ as the major component. An analysis of the diffraction profiles has allowed us to properly characterize the PMN-xPT phase diagram and to determine the stability region of the monoclinic phase, which extends from $x=31%$ to $x=37%$ at 20 K. The complex lansdcape of observed phases points to an energy balance between the different PMN-xPT phases which is intrinsically much more delicate than that of related systems such as ${\mathrm{PbZr}}_{1\ensuremath{-}x}{\mathrm{Ti}}_{x}{\mathrm{O}}_{3}$ or $(1\ensuremath{-}x)\mathrm{Pb}({\mathrm{Zn}}_{1/3}{\mathrm{Nb}}_{1/3}){\mathrm{O}}_{3}\ensuremath{-}x{\mathrm{PbTiO}}_{3}.$ These observations are in good accord with an optical study of $x=33%$ by Xu et al. [Phys. Rev. B 64, 020102 (2001)], who observed monoclinic domains with several different polar directions coexisting with rhombohedral domains, in the same single crystal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.151

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0450.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations849
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B, Condensed matterSame topicFerroelectric and Piezoelectric MaterialsFrench-language works237,207