Fatigue and/or Failure Phenomena Observed in the Fabric of Stent-Grafts Explanted After Adverse Events
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, we aimed to investigate changes to the fabric of Talent stent-grafts following implantation of aortic endografts and to determine the possible causes of fatigue and/or failure of the grafts. Six devices were explanted at reoperation (N=5) and autopsy (N=1). Selected segments were assessed nondestructively by gross observation and destructively by analyzing textile characteristics and chemical properties. All of the devices showed a 4/4 twill woven fabric of monofilament polyester. These devices, explanted at reoperation and autopsy, presented different levels of fatigue and/or failure. Numerous holes were found in the fabric of two devices. The minor damage caused by the passage of the sutures through the weave to fasten the Nitinol wires did not progress significantly over time. The sutures remained relatively intact, except for some distortions. The main failure mode was the abrasion of the yarns at the apices of adjacent Nitinol stents. In two devices, this abrasion resulted in fraying of the yarns and holes in the fabric tubes. This short series of explanted devices provides evidence of damage to polyester fabric used in aortic endografts and raises questions regarding their resistance to abrasion and the risk of endoleak associated with monofilament fabric yarn.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".