MétaCan
← all works

Management of hypertension: summary of NICE guidance

2011· article· en· 485 citations· W1969506301 on OpenAlex· 10.1136/bmj.d4891

Why is this work in the frame?

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

About CanadaIts subject is Canada, wherever its authors sit.

No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame — the usual design — would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Machine scores (provisional)

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread
0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Abstract

Hypertension is one of the most important preventable causes of death worldwide and one of the commonest conditions treated in primary care in the United Kingdom, where it affects more than a quarter of all adults and over half of those over the age of 65 years.1 This article summarises the most recent recommendations from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) on the management of hypertension,2 which updates the 2004 and 2006 clinical guidelines.3 4 5 NICE recommendations are based on systematic reviews of best available evidence and explicit consideration of cost effectiveness. When minimal evidence is available, recommendations are based on the Guideline Development Group’s experience and opinion of what constitutes good practice. Evidence levels for the recommendations are given in italic in square brackets. ### Diagnosing hypertension (Updated recommendation) [ Based on the experience and opinion of the Guideline Development Group (GDG) ]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

The record

Venue
BMJ
Topic
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Field
Medicine
Canadian institutions
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research
Keywords
NiceExcellenceGuidelineMedicineBest practiceSystematic reviewPrimary careExpert opinionQuarter (Canadian coin)Family medicineAlternative medicineEvidence-based practiceClinical PracticeMEDLINEPediatricsIntensive care medicinePathologyComputer scienceManagement
Has abstract in OpenAlex
yes