MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1969515657 · doi:10.1080/00150190600962184

Molecular Dynamics in Chiral Smectic Phases Investigated by<sup>13</sup>C-NMR Spin Lattice Relaxation Time Observation

2006· article· en· W1969515657 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueFerroelectrics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMolecular spectroscopy and chirality
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of WaterlooMinistry of Education, Science and Technology
KeywordsMaterials scienceSpin–lattice relaxationCondensed matter physicsLiquid crystalRelaxation (psychology)Lattice (music)Dynamics (music)Molecular dynamicsSpin (aerodynamics)Nuclear magnetic resonanceMolecular physicsPhysicsThermodynamicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The temperature dependence of the spin-lattice relaxation time T 1 is investigated in a chiral smectic liquid crystal, (S)-(+)-2-methylbutyl 4-(4-decyloxybenzylideneamino)cinamate (S-DOBAMBC) by means of solid-state 13 C-NMR spectroscopy. T 1 of aromatic carbon increases with increasing temperature for the temperature range of the SmA and SmC* phases, in which the frequency of the molecular rotation dominating the spin-lattice relaxation process is higher than the Larmor frequency ω 0 of 100 MHz. In addition, the temperature dependence of T 1 reveals that the activation energy of the molecular rotation in the SmC* phase is lower than that in the SmA phase. Keywords: Ferroelectric liquid crystalferroelectricityrotationmolecular dynamicsNMRsmectic liquid crystals Acknowledgment We would like to thank Mr. Hideshi Hara for his assist to complete this paper. This work was supported by the “Academic Frontier” Project for Private Universities (2001-2005) and was partially supported by the Grant-in Aid for Scientific Research (#17550169): matching fund subsidy from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.657
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it