MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1969526365 · doi:10.1021/ja992406l

Metalloion−Ligand Binding Energies and Biological Function of Metalloenzymes Such as Carbonic Anhydrase. A Study Based on ab Initio Calculations and Experimental Ion−Ligand Equilibria in the Gas Phase

2000· article· en· W1969526365 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Peschke, Arthur T. Blades, P. Kebarle

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryCarbonic anhydraseLigand (biochemistry)Gas phaseComputational chemistryAb initioCarbonic anhydrase IIIonAb initio quantum chemistry methodsEnzymePhysical chemistryBiochemistryOrganic chemistryMoleculeReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The known structure of carbonic anhydrase includes the structure of the active site, which consists of Zn 2+, coordinated to three histidine (His) residues and a water molecule. The ligand involved in the catalysis is the water molecule. Using imidazole (Im) to model histidine, it is found that histidine is the strongest bonding residue to Zn 2+ of all neutral amino acid residues. On the basis of high-level ab initio calculations, the sequential bond energies for one to three imidazoles attached to Zn 2+ were evaluated. The bond energy Zn(Im) 3 2+ −(H 2 O) was also determined by ab initio calculations and (gas phase) ion equilibria measurements. From a comparison of the free energy of stabilization of Zn 2+ in the enzyme and that in aqueous solution, we conclude that very strongly bonding residues such as histidine are essential to make the Zn 2+ ion in the enzyme stable, relative to the aqueous environment. The strongly bonding histidine also has another more important role. Due to the very large charge transfer and polarizability energy component with such a ligand and ligand−ligand repulsion, the bonding to the fourth, i.e., the H 2 O ligand, is very much weakened. It is shown that weakening of the Zn(L) 3 2+ −(H 2 O) bond energy is unfavorable, i.e., increases the energy required for the first step of the accepted mechanism, Zn(His) 3 OH 2 2+ → Zn(His) 3 OH + + H +, while the second step, Zn(His) 3 OH + + CO 2 Zn(His) 3 (H 2 O) 2+ + HCO 3 -, is favorably affected, i.e., requires less energy. The choice of the ligands L therefore must be such so as to lead to a compromise between the two opposing effects. By making a semiquantitative inclusion of the solvent effect of the protein and aqueous environment on the reaction free energies for the above two ionic reactions, it was possible to show that the “choice” of the three histidine ligands is “just right” to provide this compromise. These ligands lead to reaction free energies that are close to zero for both reactions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.384

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations55
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207