MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Surgical Treatment of Cervical Myeloradiculopathy Associated with Movement Disorders

2005· review· en· W1969527184 on OpenAlexaff
Albert Wong, Eric M. Massicotte, Michael G. Fehlings

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques · 2005
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
Canadian institutionsToronto Western HospitalUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMovement disordersCervical spineSurgeryPhysical medicine and rehabilitationInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Movement disorders may be associated with advanced cervical myeloradiculopathy, which represents a major management challenge. We report on eight patients with movement disorders causing progressive cervical myeloradiculopathy who were treated successfully by cervical decompression and reconstruction. RESULTS: The mean age of our patients was 44 years with a male/female ratio of 3:1. The average duration of symptoms prior to presentation was 10 months. The most common levels decompressed and reconstructed were C3-C4 and C4-C5. Six cases showed improvement, and two cases showed stabilization of neurologic status at a mean follow-up of 21 months. Our management strategy and results are interpreted in the context of a systematic review of the literature in which 78 cases are reported. CONCLUSIONS: Movement disorders cause premature cervical spondylosis most commonly involving the C3-C4 and C4-C5 levels. Ventral pathology with kyphotic angulation requires corpectomy or discectomy with or without posterior decompression and reconstruction. Decompression should always be combined with segmental internal fixation. Perioperative use of botulinum toxin and halo vest immobilization can increase the rate of clinical success but requires vigilance to minimize complications. Laminectomy with lateral mass fixation may be used successfully in the absence of kyphotic deformity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Spinal Disorders & TechniquesSame topicCervical and Thoracic MyelopathyFrench-language works237,207