MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Gamma frequency SSVEP components differentiate children with febrile seizures from normal controls

2008· article· en· W1969547613 on OpenAlexafffund
Ala Birca, Lionel Carmant, Anne Lortie, Phetsamone Vannasing, Maryse Lassonde

Bibliographic record

VenueEpilepsia · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchInstitute of GeneticsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsElectroencephalographyEpilepsyAudiologyVisual evoked potentialsEvoked potentialPhotic StimulationMedicineStimulationNeurosciencePsychologyInternal medicineVisual perception

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gamma band electroencephalography (EEG) abnormalities have been reported in patients with epilepsy. We aimed to investigate whether patients with febrile seizures (FS) show abnormalities of the gamma frequency steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) components evoked by intermittent photic stimulation (IPS). We analyzed the magnitude and phase alignment of the 50-100 Hz SSVEP components elicited by IPS from 12 FS patients, 5 siblings of FS patients, and 15 control children between 6 and 36 months of age. Patients with FS showed significantly higher SSVEP magnitude and phase alignment values when compared to both the siblings and control groups. Detected abnormalities could either represent the direct consequence of seizures or indicate a preexisting tendency to hypersynchrony in FS patients. Future prospective studies could assess whether SSVEP abnormalities are associated with complex rather than simple FS, or have a prognostic value for the development of epilepsy following FS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.355
Threshold uncertainty score0.977

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEpilepsiaSame topicEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFrench-language works237,207