MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1969641730 · doi:10.1080/15513810802545319

CEREBELLAR MIGRATION DEFECTS IN AICARDI SYNDROME: AN EXTENSION OF THE NEUROPATHOLOGICAL SPECTRUM

2009· article· en· W1969641730 on OpenAlexaff
Thora S. Steffensen, Enid Gilbert‐Barness, Atillano Lacson, Curtis E. Margo

Bibliographic record

VenueFetal and Pediatric Pathology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
Canadian institutionsStollery Children's HospitalUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrophthalmiaPolymicrogyriaMedicineAgenesis of the corpus callosumAnatomyHypoplasiaAgenesisPathologyCorpus callosumEpilepsyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Aicardi syndrome is characterized by infantile spasms, corpus callosum agenesis, and chorioretinal lacunae and almost exclusively affects females (very rarely, 47, XXY males). The crucial genetic mishap likely occurs in the postzygotic stage, but the variable clinical phenotype among the approximately 450 known cases has not been explained. No consistent mutations or deletions exist among patients. We encountered a baby girl with early onset infantile spasms. She had left-sided cleft lip/palate, costovertebral defects, scoliosis, callosal agenesis, and microphthalmia. She expired at the age of 3 months of respiratory infection. On autopsy she had thoracic hemivertebrae with rib defects, bilateral microphthalmia, microcornea, posterior colobomata, abnormalities of the retinal pigment epithelium, absence of normal ganglion cells in the retina, gross asymmetry of the brain with cerebral polymicrogyria, total callosal agenesis, cerebral subcortical and subependymal nodular heterotopias, cerebellar nodular heterotopias, and tegmental/basal unilateral brainstem hypoplasia. Cerebellar and retinal migration defects have not been described before in Aicardi syndrome and may have had a bearing on this patient's eventual outcome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.404

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFetal and Pediatric PathologySame topicFetal and Pediatric Neurological DisordersFrench-language works237,207