Experimental investigation of the flow in the near-field of a cross-shaped orifice jet
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The flow in the near-field of a cross-shaped orifice jet is investigated experimentally in the present study. The three components of the velocity field are obtained at different longitudinal locations using time-resolved stereoscopic particle-image velocimetry measurements. The mean and the instantaneous entrainment rates are calculated to study the entrainment mechanism. The distribution of momentum thicknesses is also inspected in the region of the axis switching. It is found that both the instantaneous entrainment rate and the net volume flux are strongly dependent on the vortical structures present in the flow and particularly at different parts of the Kelvin–Helmholtz vortex ring. Hence, different phases of the flow are investigated in the region of the axis switching. The contribution of the turbulent normal and shear stresses to the streamwise vorticity generation is also studied in the near-field of the cross jet. The momentum flux and its streamwise evolution are obtained from the mean velocity field. The contribution of different turbulent intensities to the momentum flux is given. The proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) is then applied to show the streamwise evolution of energy content of the most energetic POD modes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".