Bibliographic record
Abstract
We study the propagation dynamics of weak Raman sideband fields in a far-off-resonance Raman medium driven by a strong coupling field. We show that the interaction of the system with the strong field, under the conditions of high density, narrow Raman-transition width, and small two-photon detuning, results ina slow group velocity and a substantial enhancement of the injected anti-Stokes sideband field as well as an efficient generation of a Stokes sideband field. We find that the effective group velocity is the same for the two weak fields and is proportional to the field frequency difference instead of the frequency of the corresponding field. We also discuss the condition for exponential growth of the two sideband fields in the medium. We perform numerical calculations for solid hydrogen, a realistic system where the requirements for high density and small Raman width can be met. We demonstrate that the group velocity can be slowed down by several orders, and that the slow light plays a key role for the stimulated Raman scattering process in solid hydrogen.PACS Nos.: 42.50Gy, 42.50Hz, 42.65Ky, 42.79Nv
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".