Development and evaluation of <i>Diplotaxis muralis</i> (<i>mur</i>) cytoplasmic male sterility system in summer rape
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Diplotaxis muralis male sterility inducing cytoplasm (mur cytoplasm) and its maintainer genes were transferred from the winter rapeseed male sterile line Mangun mur CMS A-line and the mur CMS maintainer line Mangun mur CMS B-line, respectively, into summer rape lines genetically related to the open-pollinated population cultivars Regent and Karat using standard cross, backcross and test cross breeding procedures. Three genetically identical summer rape mur CMS A-line and B-line pairs, Karat I A-line and B-line, Karat II A-line and B-line and Regent A-line and B line were developed. Flower morphology studies revealed that the mur CMS A-lines had anthers displaying a complete absence of pollen and floral morphology modifications similar to that seen for other CMS systems in summer rape. Seedling emergence, days to first flower, days to maturity, and height of the vernalized mur CMS Mangun A-line and B-line pair and the summer rape mur CMS A-line and B-line pairs were similar among treatments and equal for A-line and B-line pair comparisons within cultivars for plants grown in the greenhouse. There was no evidence of biological benefits or costs associated with the mur cytoplasm. The male sterility for the vernalized Mangun mur CMS A-line and the summer rape mur CMS A-lines was stable at temperatures up to 30/24EC. Key words: Brassica napus L., male sterility, temperature stability
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".