MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1969786180 · doi:10.1097/sap.0b013e31813376a5

Mohs Micrographic Surgery and Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans

2008· article· en· W1969786180 on OpenAlex
Rebecca A. Nelson, John P. Arlette

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Plastic Surgery · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDermatofibrosarcoma protuberansMedicineMohs surgeryDermatofibrosarcomaSurgeryDemographicsPlastic surgeryWide local excisionSoft tissueDermatology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) is a rare soft tissue tumor with a high recurrence rate. The goal of this study was to review patients with DFSP treated by Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) and to compare demographics and recurrence rates with cases in the literature treated by standard excision methods. Medical charts were used to evaluate patient and tumor characteristics, number of stages for tumor clearance, reconstructive methods used, and recurrence rate after MMS. Data were compared with published recurrence rates in the literature. Our results indicate that there were no recurrences in 44 of 44 patients with DFSP resected by MMS after a mean follow-up of 3.3 years. This compares with recurrence rates in the literature of 10% to 60% using standard excision methods. We conclude that MMS provides recurrence-free treatment of DFSP tumors and promotes a collaborative approach between dermatologic and plastic surgeons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.813

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it