Prognostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Brainstem Gliomas
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Brainstem gliomas are an important oncologic problem in the pediatric age group, constituting between 10 and 15% of childhood central nervous system neoplasms. A new classification scheme based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has recently been proposed leading to speculation that gadolinium-DTPA-enhanced MRI may prove useful in defining the prognosis of subsets of patients with these tumors. We retrospectively reviewed gadolinium-DTPA-enhanced MRIs in 26 consecutive newly diagnosed pediatric patients (11 males, 15 females) from our institution between June 1988 and June 1994 with the diagnosis of diffuse brainstem glioma. The site, extent of invasion, T1 and T2 signals, and the pattern and the degree of contrast enhancement of the tumors were evaluated. We correlated the image features, clinical symptoms, and survival period in each patient. Seventeen tumors demonstrated contrast enhancement and 9 did not. The survival in the whole group ranged between 3 months and > 5 years with a median of 9 months. There was no statistical difference in the median survival between patients with or without contrast enhancement (11 versus 8 months).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it