MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1969886192 · doi:10.4000/litteratures.237

La « diabolie » en question Médecine, droit et théologie à la charnière entre xvie et xviie siècles

2013· article· fr· W1969886192 on OpenAlexaff
Patrick Dandrey

Bibliographic record

VenueLittératures · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsRoyal Society of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sous la contradiction historique, de surface, entre l’ouverture d’esprit du médecin qui raisonne et soigne le lycanthrope comme un mélancolique, et l’obscurantisme religieux de l’inquisiteur qui l’exorcise et le livre au juge pour être brûlé, se révèle en profondeur la persistance d’une autre ligne de fracture, au sein de l’imaginaire de la métamorphose, entre une transformation effective et réversible du sorcier en loup-garou et une division du lycanthrope entre son corps inerte qui dort d’un sommeil cataleptique et son double ectoplasmatique qui erre au loin en proie au délire lycanthropique. La remontée aux origines de cette image qui traverse et structure les trois discours de la science, de la foi et de la loi y révèle la survie d’une partition de l’être humain remontant aux fables indo-européennes, dont une version se retrouve dans la division entre l’homme extérieur et l’homme intérieur fondant la théorie de l’hystérie selon Sydenham, emblème de modernité et de clarté dans la nuit médicale. S’en déduit la persistance des anciens schèmes au sein des révolutions les plus apparemment novatrices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.018
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLittératuresSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207