Volume dependence of the exchange interaction and Curie temperature in Co2MGa (M = Ti and Fe): A first-principles study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Magnetic moment, exchange interaction and Curie temperature (TC) have been calculated for Co2TiGa and Co2FeGa by a first-principles density functional calculation combined with a linear response method. The exchange interaction is dominated by Co-Co pairs in Co2TiGa while that of Co2FeGa is mainly contributed by Fe-Co pairs. Based on the mean field multiple-sublattices model, the estimated TC is about 114 K for M = Ti and 1270 K for M = Fe, calculated with the experimental lattice constant, in good agreement with the experimental values (128 K and 1093 K for M = Ti and Fe, respectively). With increasing lattice constant, a, from 95% to 105% of the experimental value (aexp.), the moment per formula unit mf.u. changes from 0.43 μB to 1.0 μB and TC increases from 27 K to 142 K in Co2TiGa. However, mf.u. increases slightly from 4.98 μB to 5.40 μB while TC decreases from 1330 K to 1190 K with increasing a from 95% to 105% of aexp. in Co2FeGa. These different volume dependences of TC are ascribed to the weak ferromagnetism in Co2TiGa and the strong ferromagnetism in Co2FeGa.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".